brain-surgery.us
homepage
site contents
What's New
Feedback
About the Author
Mission
Disclaimer
Contact
 
 



Brain Tumor Education Resource

Brain tumor series #2: GLIOMA

This series covers:

  • Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM; WHO Grade 4 on 4 fibrillary astrocytoma)
  • Awake craniotomy for recurrent frontal oligoastrocytoma
  • Frontal oligodendroglioma
  • Ependymoma
  • Pilocytic astrocytoma
  • Brainstem glioma
  • Gliomatosis cerebri

For each of these cases, the following format is used:

  • Brain tumor background: An introduction to the type of brain tumor being case-presented.
  • Brain tumor clinical presentation: What were the brain tumor 's symptoms and signs?
  • Brain tumor diagnostic workup: What investigations were used to diagnose the brain tumor?
  • Brain tumor treatment paradigm: What were the options and proposed treatment for the brain tumor?
  • Brain tumor operative procedure and approach: What specific approach did the surgeon use for the brain tumor?
  • Brain tumor technical nuances and potential surgical pitfalls: What were important considerations for the brain tumor surgery?
  • Where available, brain tumor pre- and post- and/or intra-operative radiological images will be shown for the following brain tumor case examples.

vPlease note:

  • For neurosurgical patients and their families, reader-friendly and practical details of basic brain anatomy, symptoms and signs of neurosurgical lesions, step-by-step investigation and operative procedure details, operative risk counselling, informed consent, recovery and rehabilitation issues, follow-up and salvage recommendations, FAQs and other case histories are all presented elsewhere.
  • The information given below is for patients and physicians alike. However, certain areas such as those pertaining to the surgical aspects of the case are more medical jargon-intensive, being particularly suited for neurosurgical trainee teaching purposes. See elsewhere for comprehensive patient-oriented surgical information.


Introduction to gliomas

Gliomas are tumors that arise in the central nervous system (CNS; i.e., brain and spinal cord) from supporting cells known as glial cells. There are many types of glial cells in the CNS. These include astrocytes (which give rise to a type fo tumor referred to as an astrocytoma), oligodendrocytes (which give rise to the tumor referred to as an oligodendroglioma), and ependymal cells (cells that tend to line the ventricles of the brain, and which give rise to a type of tumor called an ependymoma). Sometimes, mixed-cell gliomas arise, such an oligoastrocytoma, which is a tumor comprised of principally two cell types, i.e., astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.

Why do "primary" brain tumors arise (a primary brain tumor is one originating from a cell within the CNS itself)? Some primary brain tumors (in fact the minority) arise in association with a genetic abnormality or genetic/inherited/familial syndrome (examples of such syndromes include neurofibromatosis or NF1 and NF2, Von Hippel Lindau or VHL, and tuberous sclerosis or TS), or in association with previous significant radiation exposure. The overwhelming majority of primary brain tumors, however, arise from (at this time) an unknown cause. Something (be it environmental, or some yet-indentified genetic aberration, or a truly "random" or "sporadic" event at a subcellular or "molecular" level) causes a brain cell to become abnormal and genetically "mutate" in such as way that it continues to divide and divide and divide....forming a clump or mass of cells referred to as a brain tumor. It has been reported that electromagnetic or radiofrequency radiation from mobile and cordless phone may be a significant risk factor for developing a particular type of malignant brain tumor known as an astrocytoma, the most common type of "glioma" ( see elsewhere for details). The rate at which the glial cell mass continues to divide and grow and its associated microscopic signature [e.g., how much it invades the brain, or whether or not is associated with brain tissue death (necrosis) and blood vessel changes (endothelial proliferation) -- all of which are bad microscopic or histopathologic "signs"] determine the "grade" of the tumor.

The most common type of glioma is the astrocytoma. In the U.S., about 12,000-13,000 new astrocytomas are diagnosed every year. There are different "grades" of gliomas. For example, for astrocytomas, the World Health Organization (WHO) has designated 4 grades, i.e., grades 1-4. Grade 1 is regarded as being relatively benign and carrying the best prognosis, while grade 4 is regarded as being the most malignant and carrying the worst prognosis. The lowest grade (WHO grade I) astrocytoma includes pilocytic astrocytoma (PCA), pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA); these tend to occur in the childhood population and are regarded mainly as "benign" in that they are potentially "curable" (but not always). The next grade (WHO grade II) astrocytoma is frequently labelled as a "low grade glioma" or low grade astrocytoma. Although they tend to grow very slowly over many years, they can undergo change within them, and mutate or "dedifferentiate" into a higher grade (WHO grade III or IV) of astrocytoma, both of which are regarded as "incurable". WHO grade III astrocytomas are also known as anaplastic astrocytomas (AA). They tend to have more malignant features. A WHO grade IV astrocytoma is referred to as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This has the most malignant features, and unfortunately for most persons carries the worst prognosis. Gliomas can cause disability and death by invading or infiltrating through white matter tracts of the brain, or by growing to a size that causes compression or obstruction of surrounding structures and leads to the syndrome of "raised intracranial pressure". Although gliomas tend not to seed ("metastasize") from one location in the CNS to another separate or unconnected location, they sometimes can do so (even the lowest grade of astrocytoma referred to as a PCA has been reported to seed through the cerebrospinal fluid). On rare occasions, two or more (independent/separate) gliomas are found to be present at the same time in the CNS of a given patient, a diagnosis referred to as "multicentric glioma". Following treatment, gliomas (esp. astrocytomas grade II-IV) frequently recur, and the vast majority of these recurrences are at the same location as the original tumor. Finally, surgical debulking of a tumor (implying incomplete resection) is frequent in the case of astrocytomas. The rationale for debulking is to alleviate dangerous "mass effect" and to reduce the "tumor-burden", the latter logically making postoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy more effective (akin to their being "less tumor mass to penetrate and kill"). The mass "doubling time" of an untreated glioblastoma multiforme has been estimated to be a mere one month. This is indeed startling.

A summary of astrocytomas occurring in adults is included here for completeness. Note that any given tumor will follow its own rules but some averages are given below.

WHO GRADE NAME OF TUMOR

(see above)

FREQUENCY PEAK AGE GROUP CURABLE? FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OTHER TREATMENTS CURRENT AVERAGE SURVIVAL*
I PCA 5% (Usually in kids) Yes, usually Surgery -- Potential "cure"
II "Low grade" 15-20% 30s +/- Surgery Radiation, chemotherapy Several or possibly many years
III "Anaplastic" 25-30% 40s No Surgery Radiation + chemotherapy 2-3 years
IV "GBM" 45-50% 50-60s No Surgery or nothing Radiation + chemotherapy 12-15 months

(<20% make three years even with aggressive multi-modality treatment)

* Importantly, "survival" varies from individual to individual and is based on many different factors, not just the type of tumor -- i.e., Not all tumors that are thought to be curable result in cures, and not all incurable tumors result in death from that tumor. For astrocytoma grades II-IV, other factors include the patient's age and neurological condition at the time of diagnosis, overall psychological or motivational "strength", the location of the tumor (which determines surgical access and the amount of surrounding tissue or "margin" that can be safely resected), the type(s) of treatment used and the role of "salvage surgery". Also note that different neurosurgeons have varying degrees of "aggressiveness" towards the management of WHO grade II-IV astrocytomas.


Brain Tumor section; Case 5 - Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM; WHO Grade 4 on 4 fibrillary astrocytoma)

Background: The glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the highest grade of astrocytoma, carrying the worst prognosis. Under the microscope, this tumor shows features of advanced malignancy including hypercellularity with mitoses (evidence for high cell-division rates), necrosis (tissue death), nuclear atypia and cellular pleomorphism (very different cellular and nuclear shapes), brain infiltration (invasion), blood vessel changes (endothelial proliferation), and a bizarre cell-alignment feature known as pseudopalisading. Treatment, if offered, is usually surgery, followed by whole-brain (or wide-field) radiation therapy and chemotherapy (e.g., using Temozolamide). Repeat surgery (owing to the expected regrowth of the tumor) is referred to as salvage surgery, and may certainly be appropriate for some patients, especially younger patients. The cells of a GBM certainly spread out well beyond their perceived location based on MRI imaging, and may cross the midline ("butterfly glioma") at various locations including the corpus callosum. At the time of GBM diagnosis, in addition to the age of the patient, his or her neurofunctional status (as measured by the Karnofsky score, a numerical measure of a patient's ability to carry out a set of "activities of daily living" or ADLs) can have a significant impact on survival. A younger age and a higher Karnofsky score (e.g., Karnofsky score >= 80) are better for survival, and may be used in determining whether or not surgery is feasible for a given patient.

Clinical presentation: This 58 year old female presented with headache. Her physical examination was entirely normal, including her mental status. She had a Karnofsky score of 100.

Diagnostic workup: A head CT was ordered by her local doctor. This showed a large area of hypodensity at the junction of her temporal and occipital lobes on the right side. There was no hydrocephalus. A brain MRI with and without contrast showed the lesion (abormality) to have "fluffy" contrast-enhancement along its walls, with central nerosis, and some degree of "mass effect", all of which were consistent with a high-grade primary brain tumor. The differential diagnosis based on the imaging included metastasis ( see metastasis section) and brain abscess (brain infection), but based on the patient's history the lesion was most likely a glioma (GBM in this case).

Treatment paradigm: Based on the patient's age and Karnofsky score, and the fact that the lesion was in the nondominant side of the brain and readily accessible, open surgery (craniotomy) was offered to the patient as the first-line treatment. It was explained to the patient that this kind of tumor was most likely a GBM (but this depended in the end on the pathologic diagnosis based on the forthcoming operative specimen). If indeed a GBM, it was neither completely resectable nor typically curable. Further, if it was a GBM, the patient would most likely benefit (in terms of survival time) from postoperative whole-brain (or wide-field) irradiation and chemotherapy. The option of salvage surgery was also discussed if the tumor recurred, as expected for a GBM.

Operative procedure/operative approach: A right parietotemporal craniotomy was carried out using stereotactic-MRI guidance. The contrast-enhancing area of the tumor with a slight margin was resected (as confirmed by the immediate postoperative imaging) without perceived complication. The pathologic diagnosis was GBM, as expected.

Technical nuances and potential surgical pitfalls: Stereotactic guidance should be used, especially as certain tumor-brain interfaces can be difficult to discern by eye. The author favors a rationally aggressive approach, including salvage surgery when appropriate. In nondominant brain, and for lobar GBMs, a generous margin or lobectomy should be considered where feasible. Note that surgery for GBM can be carried out for those located in deep nuclei (basal ganglia, thalamus) and brainstem. That is, these more challenging locations do not necessarily represent a contraindication to surgery, although the complication potential is higher.

Imaging:

Image 5.1 (above). Temporo-occipital glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Preoperative multiplanar enhanced MRI images. This highest-grade astrocytoma is encircled. Enhancement (bright parts of the tumor near its outer margin or along internal walls or septations) appears nodular or "fluffy". Note the central necrosis (darker regions within the tumor mass).

Image 5.2 (above). Temporo-occipital glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Postoperative multiplanar enhanced MRI images. The contrast-enhancing and centrally necrotic areas of the tumor have been resected (operative cavity now shown by dashed circles). Abnormal (neoplastic) cells of this kind of tumor exist well beyond what is seen by imaging, a fact that makes these tumors recurrent, malignant, and typically incurable.

 

Brain Tumor section; Case 6 - Awake craniotomy / Awake brain surgery for recurrent frontal oligoastrocytoma (also see link for "Awake craniotomy" below)

Background: An oligoastrocytoma is a "mixed glioma", namely, a tumor comprised of abnormal astrocytes and abnormal oligodendrocytes. There may be a predominance of either type, e.g., "astrocyte-predominant oligoastrocytoma". The pathologic "grade" of the tumor (which will determine how benignly or aggressively the tumor will behave) is likely to be dependent on the degree of astrocytic involvement in the tumor. That is to say, the more the astrocytic involvement, the more aggressively the mixed tumor is likely to behave (as a rule of thumb at least). This is because astrocytomas in general tend to behave more aggressively than oligodendrogliomas. Oligoastrocytomas should be expected to recur and a treatment plan should always include a salvage option if appropriate.

Clinical presentation: This 22 year old college student presented with increasing seizure frequency and a recurrent left frontal oligoastrocytoma. At the time of the first operation, done elsewhere, the patient was 20 years old. The surgery involved a lesionectomy (removal of only the radiological abnormality regarded by the surgeon as being the tumor or "neoplastic lesion"; i.e., no surrounding or "peritumoral" margin was removed). The conservative approach was to some extent likely due to the fact that the patient was a very high-functioning college student with a lesion that was on the "dominant side" of the patient's brain. The boy had no neurological disturbance on physical examination but was experiencing increasing frequency of his seizures. The lesion was determined to be recurrent based on routine follow-up ("serial surveillance") MRI imaging as well as his increasing seizure frequency (indicating progressive infiltration and irritation of the brain).

Diagnostic workup: The MRI showed a fairly extensive recurrent (regrown) tumor mainly located in the left frontal lobe, but with some cross-over into the right frontal lobe via the anterior (forward-most) part of the corpus callosum. There was little enhancement in the tumor mass (which was a good sign, as nodular enhancement, if present in an astrocytoma, is an indicator of an area or "focus" of probable higher grade dedifferentiation). The tumor abutted the motor strip and language area (Broca's expressive speech center) on the left side. Further workup was indicated, given that this was a young and high-functioning college student with an extensive, recurrent dominant-hemisphere brain tumor abutting critical or "eloquent" brain areas. The further workup would involve invasive brain electrode placement and brain "cortical mapping" (see below).

Treatment paradigm: Re-do surgery was recommended as a first-line procedure. However, prior to the tumor resection, it was recommended that the patient undergo open surgical implantation of brain-surface electrodes for continual "electroencephalographic" (EEG) recording. This would hopefully allow identification and mapping of the seizure focus, and then allow "functional mapping" of the brain for the location of the motor (movement) and speech areas relative to the tumor. Alternatively, functional MRI (fMRI) could have been done for this purpose too. Following the EEG recording and brain mapping studies, it was recommended that the patient undergo awake surgical resection of the tumor mass, as the studies revealed that the tumor extended right up to the patient's motor and expressive speech centers. By carrying out the surgery awake, the patient would be examined by a neurologist while the neurosurgical team progressively removed the tumor, thereby allowing the patient's real-time intraoperative neurological exam to serve as a guide to the extent of resection. This would facilitate as safe an outcome as possible for this student, who courageously wanted to return to his College after recovering from his surgery, in order to complete his degree.

Operative procedure/operative approach: The first stage of the procedure involved reopening and extension of the original incision, followed by extension of the right frontopatietal craniotomy and implantation of multiple grid and paddle surface electrode arrays across the left frontal lobe. Following EEG recording and functional mapping studies over the next several days in the intensive care unit, a map of the seizure/tumor focus was obtained and its relationship to the surrounding motor and speech cortical areas better understood. The second stage of the procedure was carried out with the patient awake (initially and intentionally kept sleepy while the relevant tissues were numbed by local anesthetic). The newly extended incision and craniotomy from the first stage were reopened and with the help of a neurologist in the operating room, the surface EEG electrodes were correlated with the map obtained from the preceding studies. A resection of the tumor was then carried out under the operating microscope to the safest extent possible with the patient (pain-free, awake, and cooperative) being examined continuously by the neurology team while the neurosurgery team did its job. [As a postscript, the patient did well postoperatively, and returned to College to complete his degree; he was referred to a neurooncology team for recommendations and followup pertaining to chemo and radiation therapy].

Technical nuances and potential surgical pitfalls: Awake craniotomy requires exceptional coordination between the neuroanesthesiologist, neurologist, neurosurgeon, and the patient. Not all patients will tolerate awake craniotomy. A detailed explanation should be offered to the patient before undertaking the procedure. Careful and well-timed administration of a transient general anesthetic, and the local anesthetic (generous temporal block and periincisional scalp skin infiltration, pin site infiltration, and later, cranial dura injection), must be carried out for this procedure to be successful. About 4 hours is the upper limit of what a patient can comfortably tolerate during an awake craniotomy. As Intraoperative seizures are a significant risk, a ice-chilled saline squirt should be ready in order to abort these should they occur. Double-check pinion placement and bony purchase prior to commencement of the incision. Double-check the seizure and brain-functional map with the neurology team in the OR prior to the resection itself. The author recommends intravenous antibiotics for several days postoperatively given that these complex surgeries involve multi-staged procedures and invasive EEG monitoring between the open stages. Finally, regarding EEG electrode placement, a wide-enough craniotomy should be carried out for generous electrode overlay if indicated; watch for bridging veins, particularly with parasagittal (anterior and posterior parasagittal) and interhemispheric electrodes.

Imaging:

Image 6.1 (above). Recurrent left frontal oligoastrocytoma. Left MRI image sagittal T1-unenhanced; right MRI image axial FLAIR. After an initial resection elsewhere 2 years earlier, the follow-up MRI imaging showed a large, left frontal recurrence (dashed circle) with some cross-over into the right hemisphere (see right image, above). Considerable edema and infiltration noted (hence its incurability). This seizure-generating lesion came close to the motor and speech areas.

Image 6.2 (above). Recurrent left frontal oligoastrocytoma. The intraoperative image from the second-stage surgery shows the recently placed EEG electrodes. As shown, a black suture/thread has been placed around the cortical margins of the tumor based on the preceding brain-mapping studies. The posterior straight-paddle array (white dashed circle) is actually over the patient's "motor strip" (which controls movement of the opposite side of the body). The patient was awake and comfortable for this surgery.

Image 6.3 (above). Recurrent left frontal oligoastrocytoma. The postoperative contrast sagittal MRI image shows considerable debulking of the tumor (previoous tumor-bed encircled), with a thin layer of (bright) enhancement representing blood products and hemostatic fabric in the resection cavity's floor. All of the tumor was not able to be resected owing to its intrinsic infiltrative properties and crossover into the right frontal lobe from the left or dominant hemisphere (as seen in Image 6.1).

 

Image 6.4 (above). Recurrent left frontal oligoastrocytoma. MRI diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequences; preoperative (left dashed circle) and postoperative (right dashed circle) images shown. The tumor has been extensively debulked without perceived morbidity in this young, high-functioning patient.


MORE ABOUT AWAKE CRANIOTOMY/AWAKE BRAIN SURGERY:

  • What is an "awake craniotomy"/"awake brain surgery"? An "awake craniotomy" is a neurosurgical procedure that involves using specialised equipment to make a bony opening (craniotomy) in a part of the skull of a patient who is awake during some part of the operation. The part for which they are awake is usually the "critical part" involving removal of the brain tumour itself, or during the surgical obliteration or disconnection of a brain vascular malformation (e.g., AV malformation, AV fistula, or cavernous malformation/cavernoma). Therefore, the procedure is also referred to as "awake brain surgery". Currently, it is a procedure carried out comfortably by only some neurosurgeons worldwide.
  • Why is an "awake craniotomy"/"awake brain surgery" carried out? Awake craniotomy is carried out or recommended to be carried out only in SOME neurosurgical patients. Its purpose (i.e., the purpose of the patient being awake during the critical part of the operation) is to make the operation safer (i.e., reduce the likelihood of a neurological impairment or "deficit" in that particular patient). CERTAIN or "SELECT" PATIENTS with brain tumours or vascular malformations involving highly eloquent (i.e., highly functionally important) parts of the brain may benefit from an awake craniotomy because the neurosurgeon can be assured of the neurological progress of the patient in real-time. Of course, the majority of patients with brain tumours or vascular malformations may not need awake surgery because their tumours or vascular malformations may not involve any highly eloquent parts of their brains. It's in the select few that being awake during the critical part of the operation can make a very positive difference to the outcome, as the neurosurgeon can be more aggressive with the condition (such as a brain cancer) knowing that the patient is awake and responsive and neurologically intact as the tumour removal or resection proceeds while the patient is simultaneously functionally tested by other members of the team. This is the key advantange of awake brain surgery.
  • Is "awake craniotomy"/"awake brain surgery" right for me? Awake craniotomy/awake brain surgery may be very appropriate for you if:
    1. You can tolerate the concept of undergoing some part of the neurosurgical procedure in a fully awake state; and
    2. You have a condition such as a brain tumour or vascular malformation that is located in or very close to a highly functionally important or eloquent part of your brain; and
    3. Your neurosurgical team is experienced and comfortable with such an approach, and the neurosurgeon and anaesthesiologist explain the expected procedure to you in appropriate detail prior to the day of the operation.
  • Are there any disadvantages of "awake craniotomy"/"awake brain surgery"? There are no significant downsides to this approach if all of the three criteria mentioned above are met.
  • Will I be in any pain during "awake craniotomy"/"awake brain surgery"? In the hands of an experienced neurosurgical team, you will not be in any pain during awake brain surgery. Why? Because appropriate local anaesthetic nerve blocks are administered around the scalp while you are asleep and prior to the commencement of surgery and before any incision is made, to allow those tissues to go numb for the duration of the procedure. Such nerve blocks can last up to 8 or so hours, while Dr Khurana carries out his awake craniotomies on average in less than 4 hours from incision to closure. Further, the anaesthesiologist adminsters certain medications in precise amounts to allow the patient to be asleep during some of the noncritical parts of the procedure, and awake for the critical parts, or as desired. Finally, the brain itself feels no pain (the brain's leathery covering known as the "dura" does sense pain, and therefore this covering layer is numbed well by the neurosurgeon using directly applied local anaesthetic solution before it is incised/opened).
  • Does The Canberra Hospital Offer an Awake Craniotomy Service/Awake Brain Surgery Program? Yes. Dr Khurana, a staff specialist neurosurgeon at The Canberra Hospital, is one of the few neurosurgeons in the Southern Hemisphere to comfortably offer awake neurosurgery as an option to some of his patients with "eloquent" brain tumours or vascular malformations. His experience was derived from training in this approach under the tutelage of Dr Fred Meyer, Chairman of the Dept. of Neurosurgery at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota USA, during the course of Dr Khurana's nine years at the Mayo. Awake neurosurgery has already been successfully carried out at The Canberra Hospital by Dr Khurana and the anaesthesiologist Dr David Duke and their dedicated team members (see images of the Awake Craniotomy Program / Awake Brain Surgery Service of The Canberra Hospital by CLICKING HERE - our Australasian partner site, www.brain-surgery.net.au]

Brain Tumor section; Case 7 - Frontal oligodendroglioma

Background: Oligodendrogliomas are gliomas that arise from oligodendrocytes. Oligodendrocytes are cells which normally lay down the myelin sheath (a fat- or lipid-rich coat that is spun around each conducting portion of a nerve cell or neuron referred to as its axon) in the CNS. Such sheaths allow axons to conduct faster and constitute much of the "white matter" of the brain. Oligodendrogliomas represent about one-quarter to one-third of all gliomas, and tend to occur most commonly in young-to-middle age adults. They most frequently present with seizures and they usually occur at the junction between the gray- and white-matter ("gray-white interface"). Frequently, on a CT scan, some degree of calcification (bright speckling) is seen in these tumors, but they seldom enhance with intravenous contrast. About one-third of these tumors have another cell type involved in the tumor, such as astrocytes or ependymal cells, and therefore often present as a "mixed" tumor. Oligodendrogliomas (or oligos for short) are classified as low-grade (grades I & II) or high-grade (grades III & IV or "anaplastic") depending on their microscopic features (many of which parallel the kinds of microscopic features noted for astrocytomas, with the key exception being that the predominant cell type in an oligodendroglioma is, as expected, an oligodendrocyte). One interesting feature about oligodendrogliomas worth noting is a certain part of its genetic signature (based on studying the specimen derived from surgery). If the oligodendroglioma's genetic makeup involves a "1p 19q deletion", then such a tumor has a higher chance of being more susceptible to chemotherapy, and the patient may have a longer tumor-free survival period. That is, a 1p 19q loss is a favorable prognostic indicator for most oligodendrogliomas.

In terms of treating oligodendrogliomas, the usual first-line treatment is surgery. Chemotherapy has also been found to be useful. Radiation therapy is frequently reserved for patients with recurrent high-grade oligodendrogliomas, particularly if salvage surgery is not carried out for whatever reason. Pure oligodendrogliomas have a better prognosis than mixed oligoastrocytomas (and a mixed oligoastrocytoma usually has a better prognosis than a pure astrocytoma). A very calcified oligodendroglioma may have a better prognosis than a non-calcified oligodendroglioma, but this remains to be proven. An oligodendroglioma located in a region where more radical resection can be carried out (i.e., where a wider surgical margin around the tumor can be safely obtained) should be expected to be associated with longer disease-free survival.

Clinical presentation: This 63 year old female presented with a seizure, with a background of chronic mild headache, and some slowly progressive confusion. Her neurological exam was normal except for some mild impairment of cognitive function (per the "mental status assessment"): she had a reduced attention span and some memory dysfunction, and her thought-processing speed seemed to be reduced.

Diagnostic workup: A head CT revealed a "hypodense" mass in the frontal region positioned in-between both frontal lobes. There was no calcification on the bone-windows of that study. A stereotactic brain MRI was carried out with and without contrast to beter define the mass. It was nonenhancing and located in the subcallosal "caval" region (cavum of the septum pellucidum). There was mild obstructive hydrocephalus due to the pressure exerted by the mass on the lateral ventricles at the foramina of Monro.

Treatment paradigm: The mass was symptomatic, large and considered to be potentially life-threatening from the perspective of its ability to cause acute obstructive hydrocephalus. Surgery was recommended as first-line treatment. Safe, gross-total resection was the operative goal.

Operative procedure/operative approach: An interhemispheric approach was proposed through a limited bicoronal incision. Stereotactic MRI guidance was used to mimimize the paramedian-to-midline frontoparietal craniotomy, and to optimize the intraoperative trajectory and transcallosal incision (focal callosotomy). The craniotomy was 6x4 cm, and to the midline. The superior sagittal sinus was exposed in order to allow the durotomy to extend to the lateral margin of this structure. After "walking down" the falx, and avoiding bridging veins, the parafalcine corridoor was opened down to the corpus callosum. Identification and preservation of the callosomarginal and pericallosal arteries was carried out. The corpus callosum was opened in a right paramedian plane, away from the right pericallosal artery, and using Stereotatic guidance to optimize the best location for its opening. The structures of the right ventricle and foramen of Monro were identified early, and then the tumor tissue was identified and aspirated. The result of the intraoperative frozen-section was oligodendroglioma. The tumor was gross-totally resected without major morbidity. An external ventricular drain (EVD) was left in postoperatively (via direct cannulation of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle at the end of the procedure).

Technical nuances and potential surgical pitfalls: Stereotactic MRI guidance for any transcallosal work should be expected to make the location of the callosotomy relative to the location of the lesion as precise as possible. The bicoronal incision and frontoparietal craniotomy do not need to be very large. A true-lateral (90 degree) head turn with contralateral shoulder- and hip-bumping as appropriate, with a 45-degree upward head-tilt is excellent in avoiding brain retraction (by allowing gravity to "retract" the dependent hemisphere) and in enabling the surgeon's hands to work in a horizontal plane, but has been found by some to be less anatomically intuitive (hence another reason for stereotactic MRI guidance). The craniotomy does indeed need to be to the midline (in order to get a good interhemispheric corridoor with little or no additional brain retraction), and the superior sagittal sinus should therefore be carefully exposed. The usual precautions and a (preemptive) plan-of-hemorrhage-control should be in place during any work over or near a venous sinus. Identification and protection of the callosomarginal and pericallosal arteries are essential, as are identification and preservation of a fornix as it wraps around the foramen of Monro in a medial-to-lateral, posterior-to-anterior and superior-to-inferior curved trajectory. An EVD placed into the ventricular system via direct cannulation (i.e., under direct visualization) at the end of the procedure is helpful as a protection against intraventricular blood product accumulation.

Imaging:

Image 7.1 (above). Frontal oligodendroglioma. Preoperative MRI T1-contrast sagittal (left) and axial (right) images. The mass is located under the front (anterior) half of the corpus callosum (left dashed circle), and in the cavum septum pellucidum (right dashed circle). No significant enhancement is seen. Mild hydrocephalus is noted from CSF outflow obstruction at the level of the foramina of Monro.

Image 7.2 (above). Frontal oligodendroglioma. Preoperative MRI FLAIR axial (left) and postoperative MRI FLAIR axial (right) images. The mass has been gross-totally resected (compare contents of dashed circles). The hydrocephalus has resolved.


Brain Tumor section; Case 8 - Ependymoma

Background: An ependymoma arises from an ependymal cell that has mutated and begins to divide uncontrollably. Ependymal cells normally line the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-containing ventricles and spinal canal. Most patients presenting with brain ependymomas are in fact children; nearly all patients presenting with spinal cord ependymomas are adults. In the brain, one of the most common sites for an ependymoma to occur is in the fourth ventricle (posterior fossa). Unfortunately, ependymomas frequently seed the CSF with abnormal tumor cells, resulting in (metastatic) deposits elsewhere in the central nervous system. For this reason, any patient diagnosed with a brain ependymoma should also have the whole spine/spinal cord imaged, while patients presenting with spinal ependymomas should also have their brain imaged. In all cases, the imaging method of choice is MRI with and without contrast. Ependymomas may be low-grade (carrying a good prognosis) or high-grade (anaplastic; carrying a worse prognosis). Regrettably, children with brain ependymomas frequently have anaplastic lesions and therefore should, whenever feasible, be aggressively treated. The first-line treatment of choice for a brain ependymoma is surgery. Second line-treatment is radiation therapy. Ependymomas of the fourth ventricle are known to be quite radiosensitive. Chemotherapy for ependymomas has been generally reserved for difficult, recurrent tumors, and the role of chemotherapy in prolonging survival for patients with this type of tumor is debatable.

Clinical presentation: An 11 year old boy presented with headache associated with nausea and vomiting, and progressive gait imbalance. Physical examination showed an unwell looking child with papilledema and gait ataxia.

Diagnostic workup: A head CT with and without contrast revealed a 3 cm mass located in the fourth ventricle, with significant obstructive hydrocephalus and moderate enhancement. An external ventricular drain (EVD) was placed with good relief of the child's symptoms (care was taken to avoid upward herniation via overdrainage). Following this, an urgent stereotactic brain and spinal MRI scan with and without contrast was obtained in preparation for surgery. The MRI showed the tumor to be arising from the floor of the fourth ventricle and an exophytic component around the obex and foramina of Luschka; enhancement was fairly uniform. There was markedly less hydrocephalus following EVD placement. No drop metastases were seen in the spinal axis. The provisional diagnosis was fourth ventricular ependymoma; the differential diagnosis included medulloblastoma versus dorsally exophytic pilocytic astrocytoma.

Treatment paradigm: After informed consent was received from the child's parents, the child was taken to the operating room for planned gross-total resection of the tumor.

Operative procedure/operative approach: Stereotactic frameless MRI-based image-guidance was used for the procedure. The EVD had already been placed but was maintained clamped for the operation. To optimize safety, facial nerve and brainstem-auditory evoked response (BAER) monitoring was used, as was somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) recording and an endotracheal tube with CN 9 and 10 monitoring capacity. In the prone position, a midline suboccipital craniotomy was carried out, and a telovelar approach was used to access the lesion in the fourth ventricle without the need for any vermian split. The tumor was gross-totally resected. The fourth ventricle floor was carefully inspected under the operating microscope. There was no significant invasion into the floor of the fourth ventricle. Watertight dural closure was obtained.

Technical nuances and potential surgical pitfalls: The telovelar approach should be considered in preference to vermian split whenever possible. During dissection around the vallecula and cephalad through the paper-thin inferior medullary velum, watch for any PICA branches in this region which should be preserved (although smaller telovelar vessels can be safely coagulated). Stereotaxy and microscopic visualization (augmented by brainstem monitoring; CN 7-10) should prevent any inadvertant entry into the floor of the fourth ventricle. Keep the floor and obex and foramen magendie protected from instruments and blood products with a gently placed small Telfa during tumor dissection. Too high a dissection along the medullary velum may result in compromise of the dentate nucleus at the dentate tubercle of the fourth ventricle, or of the superior cerebellar peduncle. Following EVD placement, avoid upward herniation via carefully controlled CSF diversion.

Imaging:

Image 8.1 (above). A tumor of the fourth ventricle region (posterior fossa). Preoperative T1 sagittal noncontrast image. The "intraaxial" mass fills the posterior fossa. It has a solid and a cystic component. There is obstructive hydrocephalus, as well as compression (effacement) versus infiltration of the floor of the fourth ventricle. The differential diagnosis includes ependymoma, medulloblastoma and dorsally exophytic pilocytic astrocytoma in this young child.

 

Brain Tumor section; Case 9 - Pilocytic astrocytoma

Background: Pilocytic astrocytoma (PCA) is the most common glioma among children. Pilocytic astrocytomas are WHO grade I lesions and are for the most part regarded as benign and potentially curable by surgery alone. They can arise in the posterior fossa (cerebellum, brainstem/floor of fourth ventricle region), and elsewhere including the optic nerve/optic chiasm (referred to as an "optic glioma"), and hypothalamus region ("hypothalamic glioma"). Infrequently, they can undergo malignant change (anaplastic pilocytic astrocytoma). When occuring in the posterior fossa, they can present with gait difficulty (ataxia) and incoordination, symptoms and signs of raised intracranial pressure, doubles vision and facial asymmetry. In the optic region, they can present with painless proptosis (eyeball protrusion) and visual impairment. In the hypothalamic region, a pilocytic astrocytoma can cause obstructive hydrocephalus and endocrine dysfunction. The first-line treatment of these tumors is surgery. In the posterior fossa, surgery is regarded as the potentially definitive treatment and in this location there is no significant role for radiation therapy of any kind.

Clinical presentation: A young child presented with failure-to-thrive, vomiting, incoordination, and double vision. The child appeared distressed, had obvious gait ataxia and diplopia. Papilledema was unable to be accurately determined at the bedside owing to the child's discomfort.

Diagnostic workup: An emergent stereotactic CT head scan with and without contrast showed a large posterior fossa mass, mosty cystic with a mural (wall) nodule that brightly enhanced with contrast. The mass was eccentric to the right side of the cerebellum. The cystic component was large and effaced the fourth ventricle resulting in marked obstructive hydrocephalus.

Treatment paradigm: An EVD was placed with good benefit while waiting for surgery. The amount of CSF diversion was carefully controlled to avoid upward herniation. Informed consent was received for craniotomy.

Operative procedure/operative approach: A suboccipital craniotomy eccentric to the right was performed in the prone position and with stereotactic CT guidance. Following a focal right cerebellar corticotomy, the cyst was entered early and aspirated/decompressed in order to achieve good posterior fossa/cerebellar relaxation up front. The mural nodule was indentified and resected entirely. A watertight dural closure was carried out. The EVD was maintained clamped for the procedure and removed on post-operative day#3 without need for conversion to a shunt.

Technical nuances and potential surgical pitfalls: Early entry into and decompression of a significant cystic component under stereotactic and visual guidance is advised for up front control of any posterior fossa cyst-related mass effect. Resection of the pseudocapsular cyst wall is not needed as long as there has been complete resection of the mural nodule (solid nodular and enhancing component of the tumor; resection of this is required for definitive control, as is also the case for a hemangioblastoma).

Imaging: See Figure 8.1 (above)

 

Brain Tumor section; Case 10 - Brainstem glioma

Background: A brainstem glioma in the truest and original sense is a low-grade astrocytoma (see above) that diffusely infiltrates and expands the brainstem, particularly the pons region. Most patients with this particular tumor are therefore not open surgical candidates, and typically not even candidates for stereotactic needle biopsy if the age-group and imaging features are consistent. They are, however, candidates for chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and CSF diversion procedures (e.g., ventriculoperitoneal or VP shunting).

It should be noted that some physicians use the term "brainstem glioma" in a less strict sense, in which case any "glioma" of the brainstem region is considered a "brainstem glioma". That is, in this latter context (which some consider to be technically incorrect - albeit debatable), a brainstem glioma may be an ependymoma or a focal astrocytoma of any grade involving the brainstem (including pilocytic astrocytoma) - for these types of "brainstem gliomas", there is indeed frequently a surgical role.

Unfortunately, in the strict sense of the term "brainstem glioma", most patients with a diffuse astrocytoma expanding the pons are children or adolescents, and this type of brainstem glioma is malignant and carries a poor prognosis.

Clinical presentation: A four year old boy presented with progressive gait imbalance. Physical examination showed gait ataxia and mild facial asymmetry. There was no papilledema or diplopia.

Diagnostic workup: Brain MRI with and without contrast showed a diffusely expanded pons. There was minimal contrast enhancement. No hydrocephalus was seen. T2-weighted imaging showed diffuse and homogeneous hyperintensity throughout the pons.

Treatment paradigm: The findings were consistent with a low-grade astrocytoma of the pons. No stereotactic biopsy was offered. Instead, the child was offered chemotherapy and radiation therapy to slow the growth of the lesion. It was discussed that if the child developed hydrocephalus, VP shunting would be an appropriate consideration at that time.

Operative procedure/operative approach: N/A. VP shunt placement is discussed elsewhere.

Technical nuances and potential surgical pitfalls: N/A.

Imaging: N/A.


Brain Tumor section; Case 11 - Gliomatosis cerebri

Background: Gliomatosis cerebri is a term used to describe an unusual circumstance where typically two or more lobes of a hemisphere, and possibly parts of the other hemisphere, are diffusely infiltrated by the same glioma. The glioma itself tends to be, for the most part at least, a low-grade glioma (equivalent to WHO grade II astrocytoma). However, some areas of dedifferentiation (see Case 5, above) may occur, resulting in foci of higher grade tumor within the "sea" of low-grade gliomatous change. Unfortunately surgical debulking is usually not a viable option owing to the extensive amount of brain tissue involved by this infiltrative tumor. Brain biopsy is frequently carried out to rule out some other CNS disease process such as CNS lymphoma, demyelination, and so forth. Treatment is largely a combination of chemotherapy and whole-brain (or wide-field) radiation therapy, and steroids are used to quell mass effect. A ventriculoperitoneal (VP) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt may be inserted palliatively to relieve the effects of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) from obstructive hydrocephalus.

Clinical presentation: A 54 year old male presented with morning headache and worsening mental status, characterized by confusion and somnolence (increased drowsiness). Physical examination showed papilledema (raised ICP can result in fluid-back pressure on, and blurring of, the optic disc margins) but no other physical impairment. Obvious impaired mentation was present.

Diagnostic workup: A head CT showed diffuse hypodense change affecting the left hemisphere with mild mass effect on the left lateral ventricle. A brain MRI with and without contrast showed a diffusely infiltrative process in the left hemisphere, involving multile lobes, entering into the corpus callosum and also permeating the insula and uncinate fasciculus. There was very mild enhancement, but no obvious focal enhancement. A frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy using multiplanar CT-guidance was carried out to confirm the radiological diagnosis of gliomatosis cerebri.

Treatment paradigm: Despite its symptomatic presentation, open surgery was not felt to be appopriate for this patient given the diffuse nature of this biopsy-confirmed tumor. Palliative VP shunt placement was offered to the patient and his family but was declined. The patient was commenced on steroids to alleviate the mass effect. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy were also offered to the patient and his family.

Operative procedure/operative approach: Stereotactic frame-based biopsy through a single, small "stab" incision was used with multiplanar enhanced CT-guidance. No discrete area of enhancement was noted on the pre-operative scan, and the target chosen was therefore deemed to be a representative area of the diffuse abnormality in a relatively safely accessible location (subcortical left frontal lobe). Multiple specimens were sent for frozen and permanent pathology. The intraoperative diagnosis returned as a low-grade gliomatous process consistent with astrocytoma.

Technical nuances and potential surgical pitfalls: For frame-based procedures, the head-frame coordinates, OR bed coordinates (where applicable), needle/probe depths, and trajectory plan should be multiply and meticulously checked by at least two people including the surgeon. The head frame's pin-skull purchase and the strength and evenness of the head frame's attachment points at the OR table should also be reconfirmed. Trajectories should be the safest (not always the shortest) path accessing a "representative or high-suspicion" target area and avoiding "ventricles and vessels" on the way. Multiple cores at different depths and biopsy chamber orientations may be necessary. Straddling the interface of a more-normal versus a clearly-abnormal area of a suspected glioma on a given biopsy attempt is likely to be more helpful to the pathologist than accessing the core of a necrotic focus. That is, contrast-enhancing lesion walls and brain-lesion interfaces are frequently helpful targets in biopsies for suspected gliomas. Cannula-irrigation following each biopsy is important as hemorrhage is always a concern. Check coags preoperatively. The need for triple-checking each step of this protocol-driven procedure cannot be overemphasized. Finally, if using a standard burr hole for the biopsy, the surgeon should watch for brain-shift and avoid any cortical vessels during the early part of probe advancement. This advantage of direct visualization is lost when using a twist-drill, even through there is some "saving" on incision length.

Imaging: N/A.